.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Thursday, December 29, 2005

I don't want to be Good

The tincanman's Good and Evil post is interesting. So is the test.

Anyway, I am Neutral Good. I really wanted to be either Chaotic Neutral, although I would also have been happy with Chaotic Evil or Neutral Evil or Pure Neutral.
Neutral Good
"Pure Good" "Benefactor"

Often goes along with the laws and desires of the group as being the easiest course of action, but ethical considerations clearly have top priority. May pursue quite abstract goals. Often aloof and difficult to understand.

Will keep their word to others of good alignment
Would not attack an unarmed foe
Will not use poison
Will help those in need
May work with others
Indifferent to higher authority
Indifferent to organizations

A neutral good [person] will obey the law, or break it when he or she sees it will serve a greater good. He or she is not bound strongly to a social system or order. His or her need to help others and reduce their suffering may take precedence over all else. Neutral good [people] do good for goodness' sake, not because they are directed to by law or by whim.

This alignment desires good without bias for or against order.

Nothing wrong with neutral good. Looks good on you.

Why be evil? You'd accrue some bad karma. And being evil takes a fair amount of effort. And minions don't come cheap any-more, especially with the "wounded in action" compensation plans, and the possibly of being sued for creating a stressful environment.

Be tough and ruthless, but in a good way.
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?